Page 73 - AERC Strategic Plan 2 July2020
P. 73

THE AERC 2020–2025 STRATEGIC PLAN




               Table A1: AERC activities that contribute to ‘Research’ domain
               outcomes



                Intermediate   Activities
                Outcome
                1.4; 1.5       Redesigning the Thematic and Collaborative research models to foster the synergies
                               discussed above. This will include conducting collaborative research framework and
                               country-case studies following the development of proposals by thematic research
                               groups, with several review workshops being undertaken, noting the assumptions and
                               risks identified.
                1.4; 1.7       Developing new quality assurance mechanisms for collaborative and thematic
                               research proposals to ensure proposals are of a sufficiently high quality and that they
                               generate the types of synergies expected by the AERC.
                1.5; 1.7       Conducting thematic research after a rigorous pre-screening of proposals by thematic-
                               group resource persons assigned by the group chairs; and presentation of the new
                               proposals at the Biannual Research Workshop, with subsequent award of research
                               grants to successful proposals.

                1.5; 1.7       Conducting methodological technical workshops and research mentorships to
                               enhance analytical skills of early-career researchers. This will include taking into
                               consideration the various constraints faced by both junior and senior academics and
                               the resource constraints faced by the AERC.
                1.5            Redesigning incentive mechanisms for collaborative and thematic research to promote
                               novelty and innovativeness in research and publication in high-impact journals.
                1.6            Conducting a comprehensive review of the operational modalities of the CMAP, CMAAE,
                               and CPP universities to verify continued validity and identify any changes in the initial
                               design assumptions, risks, and sustainability.
                1.6; 1.7       Conducting subject specialist workshops to review and develop curricula for CMAP,
                               CMAAE, and CPP elective and core courses to keep abreast with new developments in
                               economics and ensure there is enough applied and policy content.
                1.6; 1.7       Conducting training on blended learning and developing and implementing
                               e-learning modules for CMAP and CMAAE elective courses.
                1.6            Conducting joint facility and shared facility for elective courses for CMAP, CMAAE, and
                               CPP and that will signal comprehensiveness, efficiency, and quality.
                1.6            Conducting stakeholder and subject-specialist workshops to identify and develop a set
                               of elective courses for CPP students seeking to specialize in Agricultural and Applied
                               Economics.
                1.6; 1.7       Developing and implementing a quality index with various tiers/levels of quality for
                               use to evaluate economics curriculum of African universities seeking accreditation.

                1.6; 1.7       Conducting annual reviews of CMAP, CMAAE, and CPP universities to ensure quality of
                               teaching of core and elective courses is aligned to best global standards.
                1.6; 1.7       Conducting annual reviews of CMAP, CMAAE, and CPP to ensure these are aligned
                               to the quality standards that will be developed. These reviews will then lead to a
                               programme of incremental improvement that is feasible and relevant in the specific
                               institutional context.

                1.6; 1.7       Conducting a feasibility study on joint delivery of electives to assess the extent to
                               which there can be a joint approach to delivery between universities in specific
                               regions.






                                                                                                         60  |
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78