Page 92 - AERC Strategic Plan 2 July2020
P. 92

THE AERC 2020–2025 STRATEGIC PLAN



               Targets against which AERC performance can be judged will be developed annually as
               part of the strategic planning process and will build on those already included in the
               Table of Targets and Indicators (which accompanies the ToC logic).


               Indicatively, the three main processes envisioned for AERC-wide evaluation are
               described below.




               Brief Reviews by External Experts



               The AERC should develop and maintain relationships with advisers who are familiar
               with its work and who can conduct objective assessments that provide succinct
               answers to one or more key evaluation questions, as well as provide realistic, actionable
               recommendations on how performance can be improved. In general, reviews should be
               brief (15–25 person days) and should be based on desk reviews and discussions with
               both AERC management/staff and key stakeholders, such as donors and economic policy
               stakeholders. Reviews should be conducted annually and be timed to feed into AERC
               Board meetings and/or Management Committee meetings.


               The team responsible for MEF and AERC management will need to identify the focus and
               requirements for each review and prepare terms of reference accordingly. This should be
               done with collaborative input from donors and other partners to ensure the reviews are
               of relevance to a broad array of stakeholders.




               Annual Internal Assessments



               A second mechanism for answering the Strategic Evaluation Questions outlined in
               the MEF Table A4 is an annual internal assessment, which should be considered as an
               extension of the annual reflection sessions that are described above in the approach
               to AERC-wide strategic performance monitoring. Whereas the reflection sessions are
               focused on validation, reflection, and synthesis, the internal review should go a step
               further to provide a high-level assessment about the overall ‘merit’ of the AERC (framed
               in terms of indicative answers to the evaluation questions in the MEF). The assessment
               should be based on all the various evidence related to AERC performance compiled over
               the course of the year, and to identify any gaps in either performance or evidence. These
               assessments should be timed to feed into annual reporting/Board meeting/Management
               Committee, as the case may be.


               The focus of the annual internal review should be on the degree to which the AERC is
               contributing to the high-level outcomes articulated in the ToC. While new management
               and implementation processes for the strategic plan are still being established and
               institutionalised,  during the  initial phase  (one to two  years) an additional focus on


                                                                                                         79  |
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97